Thread: LCD vs. e-ink
View Single Post
Old 10-30-2010, 01:16 PM   #25
Sil_liS
Wizard
Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 4,896
Karma: 33602910
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: PocketBook 903 & 360+
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew H. View Post
"Eyestrain" as used by the doctor is presumably a medical term with a medical definition. I don't have any problem accepting the fact that reading on an LCD screen is not "medically" worse than reading on an e-ink screen - at least not for most people.
Found here:
"Asthenopia (eye strain) – a sense of fatigue brought on by use of the eyes for prolonged close work or in persons who have uncorrected error of refraction. Symptoms are usually aching or burning of the eyes, accompanied by headache. "

Also I found something interesting here, and the point that is relevant for the discussion would be "(c) The reading conditions":
"The brightness ratio between a book and the surrounding table surface should be 1:1 ideally, but a value of 3:1 is acceptable. Beyond 5:1 there is some impairment."
Sil_liS is offline   Reply With Quote