View Single Post
Old 12-19-2012, 10:04 AM   #5
murraypaul
Interested Bystander
murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,725
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
Quote:
Originally Posted by joehunt View Post
So in brief, the publishers are still dictating discounts
The restriction [for the new Agency 2.0 publishers] is only that a retailer cannot take a net loss across all of a publisher's titles. As long as the time window that is measured across isn't too small, that doesn't seem particularly limiting. All it does is stop someone buying market share by running at a loss.
[The MacMillan restrictions are much more onerous.]

Isn't this Agency 2.0 essentially what was discussed during the earlier settlement discussions?

Last edited by murraypaul; 12-19-2012 at 10:07 AM.
murraypaul is offline   Reply With Quote