Originally Posted by pilotbob
No. I don't see a problem. Most first books of a series still pretty much stand on their own. For example, I have read Mistborn... it is the first of 3 but the story in that particular book ended and while I want to read more I don't feel the story wasn't concluded.
Magic Kingdom For Sale - Sold is the first of 5 I think in that series. But, it is also a great stand alone story. this book is what got my hooked on Terry Brooks. Same with Wizard's First Rule... etc.
Ok... now there is a rule...
Rule: there is no rule about nominating a book from a series/triligy, etc.
So then it is ok to nominate a book in the middle of a series even though that's just wrong?