Originally Posted by RWood
On my Reader pdflrf beats Rasterfarian by a good margin.
in what terms? size, speed, design or quality? and what kind of files, textbased or image? quite important to give more details if you ask me...
also, as cacapee said in the rasterfarian thread, pdflrf has no sharpening, the resulting image should be lesser quality than rasterfarian in theory for images. There is simply less image optimizing.