You've entirely lost me - I haven't "accused" you of advocating anything. I was simply following up on an argument that you appeared to be making suggesting that, because HP eBooks are not commercially available, there is no economic loss to Ms. Rowling as a result of downloading said eBooks. I believe that to be a flawed argument because it neglects the situation where someone who would otherwise have bought a paper version of the book downloads it instead.
Apologies if I've misunderstood your viewpoint or your logic.
Currently proofreading The Poison Belt, by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.