View Single Post
Old 01-01-2010, 02:55 AM   #11
sircastor
Reader
sircastor got an A in P-Chem.sircastor got an A in P-Chem.sircastor got an A in P-Chem.sircastor got an A in P-Chem.sircastor got an A in P-Chem.sircastor got an A in P-Chem.sircastor got an A in P-Chem.sircastor got an A in P-Chem.sircastor got an A in P-Chem.sircastor got an A in P-Chem.sircastor got an A in P-Chem.
 
sircastor's Avatar
 
Posts: 85
Karma: 6124
Join Date: Jul 2009
Device: PRS-505
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valloric View Post
Really? You care that much about the possibility of the internal regex engine switching to PCRE? I'd love to know why.

I mean, I know why I care about it, but I'm interested in why are you so excited about the prospect. Knowing the reason would give me more perspective.
When it comes down to it, it was really a matter of me simply being very familiar with PCRE regex, and not really with any other library. It's just a pain when you have to go look up something.

(I just realized that "PCRE regex" is a bit redundant)
sircastor is offline   Reply With Quote