View Single Post
Old 10-27-2009, 09:58 PM   #12
fugazied
Wizard
fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.
 
fugazied's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,305
Karma: 1958
Join Date: Jan 2009
Device: iPod Touch
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralph Sir Edward View Post
Still, it's supposed to be a much lower energy user than LCD, and for small devices, the screen is what eats the most juice anyway...
That's an interesting thought though, I usually look at improving battery technology to get longer life out of these devices with LCD chewing a large amount of power. But improving display technologies is probably more feasible at this stage since they are having a hard time getting better batteries!

Will be interesting to see what kinds of devices this technology appears in.
fugazied is offline   Reply With Quote