View Single Post
Old 09-05-2009, 10:45 AM   #11
Ankh
Guru
Ankh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ankh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ankh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ankh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ankh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ankh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ankh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ankh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ankh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ankh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ankh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Ankh's Avatar
 
Posts: 713
Karma: 2003741
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Ottawa, ON
Device: Kobo Touch
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jellby View Post
Of course, you all know re-saving a JPG image as JPG again will only reduce the quality (even if you save it with a higher "quality" setting), so this should be done with the starting source images (either scanned, or large JPGs, or whatever).
True, but it opens up a question of how far we are ready to go with the quality of raster images?

The current technology for screens of dedicated reader devices is what it is. On 600x800 eInk screens, the loss is negligible. For those who read ePubs on computer screens, the situation is quite different.

Now, considering the perfectly probable emergence of high-resolution, full-colour screens for mobile devices a decade from now, do you go with the maximum resolution (and quality) for materials that you scan, future-proofing your publication? Lossless compression?
Ankh is offline   Reply With Quote