View Single Post
Old 03-25-2009, 05:13 PM   #1
Madam Broshkina
Manic Do Fuse
Madam Broshkina is a name known to allMadam Broshkina is a name known to allMadam Broshkina is a name known to allMadam Broshkina is a name known to allMadam Broshkina is a name known to allMadam Broshkina is a name known to allMadam Broshkina is a name known to allMadam Broshkina is a name known to allMadam Broshkina is a name known to allMadam Broshkina is a name known to allMadam Broshkina is a name known to all
 
Madam Broshkina's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,312
Karma: 159112
Join Date: Oct 2006
Device: Sony 500, 505, 350, Kindle 3, DXG, nook, Irex DR800SG, iPad
US Supreme Court mentions Kindle

I was reading the oral arguments in Case 08-205, Citizens United v. The Federal Election Commission and noticed that the Kindle was mentioned by Justice Kennedy.

Quote:
MR. STEWART: If the book contained the functional equivalent of express advocacy. That is, if it was subject to no reasonable interpretation -
JUSTICE KENNEDY: And I suppose it could even, is it the Kindle where you can read a book? I take it that's from a satellite. So the existing statute would probably prohibit that under your view?
MR. STEWART: Well, the statute applies to cable, satellite, and broadcast communications. And the Court in McConnell has addressed the -

JUSTICE KENNEDY: Just to make it clear, it's the government's position that under the statute, if this kindle device where you can read a book which is campaign advocacy, within the 60-30 day period, if it comes from a satellite, it's under -- it can be prohibited under the Constitution and perhaps under this statute?
MR. STEWART: It -- it can't be prohibited, but a corporation could be barred from using its general treasury funds to publish the book and could be required to use -- to raise funds to publish the book using its PAC.
You can read the whole thing here:


http://www.supremecourtus.gov/oral_a...pts/08-205.pdf
Madam Broshkina is offline   Reply With Quote