View Single Post
Old 10-16-2014, 08:40 PM   #19
DiapDealer
Grand Sorcerer
DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DiapDealer's Avatar
 
Posts: 27,597
Karma: 193191846
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveEisenberg View Post
US retailers of today experiencing success without predatory pricing include Wegmans and Costco.
"Without predatory pricing."
Meaning you're suggesting that Amazon IS guilty of "predatory pricing;" meaning you're either guilty of purposely misusing the inflammatory term for emphasis and effect, or that you just simply don't understand what it actually is.

That fact that some retailers choose not to employ (and even manage to thrive) without loss-leader pricing is not proof that loss-leader pricing is "bad" or "predatory" (or that other companies should stop doing it).

Please stop trying to falsely conflate loss-leader pricing with predatory pricing. One is perfectly legal, the other is not.

Last edited by DiapDealer; 10-16-2014 at 08:42 PM.
DiapDealer is online now   Reply With Quote