Originally Posted by HarryT
I think personally that this is the correct result in this particular case, given that (I believe) something over 90% of the content of this book consisted of material "lifted" directly from the HP books. Limited quoting for academic purposes is "fair use", but this clearly isn't.
I didn't talk about if the ruling is right or wrong, honestly I don't know by far enough of this case. I just considered it pretty unfair having her have several concluding statements for public while him none. Regardless if right or wrong.