View Single Post
Old 04-14-2013, 11:49 PM   #60
Andrew H.
Grand Master of Flowers
Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,201
Karma: 8389072
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Naptown
Device: Kindle PW, Kindle 3 (aka Keyboard), iPhone, iPad 3 (not for reading)
Quote:
Originally Posted by taustin View Post
If you have evidence that whatever survey that claim is based on was falsified, you should complain to the FCC. It's illegal to do things like that. Really.
This is not about the FCC. It's about the ad company doing independent research and putting that on the commercial. They can't do that.
Quote:

And manipulating a survey to get the results you want isn't the same thing as a deliberate lie, legally or morallyl.
So? That is not relevant to the example above.
Quote:
.

Yeah, but juries are notoriously unsympathetic to litigants that are at least a slimy as the other side. She deliberately lied with a fraudulent intent. Get over it.
"Get over it?" I'm not the one filling the board with posts on this topic discussing "spackle" and how there is no such thing as "age discrimination." I was curious why Hoang thought she could win an age discrimination case, and how a case like that even made it to the jury...and it turns out it wasn't an age discrimination case at all, but a contract case which was sufficiently close that it made it to the jury.
Andrew H. is offline   Reply With Quote