Originally Posted by PatNY
Also, murray, you don't keep these actual sales figures in your head. You've researched them only now. So you're telling me when you first come across this story, you're going to immediately jump on it, even though at the time you really don't know what the Q2 2012 sales numbers are? Or the previous quarter's either?
I knew that the previous record was around 35m (actually 37m), from a previous discussion. That is why the 65 million (which was the figure in the original story that started this thread) jumped out so much.