View Single Post
Old 01-16-2013, 12:48 PM   #73
PatNY
Zennist
PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
PatNY's Avatar
 
Posts: 928
Karma: 46026034
Join Date: Jul 2010
Device: iPod Touch, Sony PRS-350, Nook HD+ & HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbjb View Post
My point doesn't mean that companies can't deny *some* incorrect rumours - they just have to avoid setting the expectation that they will *always* deny incorrect rumours. It's that expectation which allows inferences to be drawn from an absence of denial.

/JB

Well, my point is, if they can deny a harmful rumor, they will. If they can't deny it because it is true, they won't attempt to.

--Pat
PatNY is offline