Originally Posted by tompe
Read a bit more careful. For example I never claimed that all interpretations of "reading is reading" are false. I actually did not claim than any interpretation was false. I said something else.
I wasn't really disagreeing with you, just playing with the "reading is reading" phrase. I do disagree with the posted article but that was a billion pages ago.
I would be curious to know if the article's author would be willing to make the logical extension...that quadriplegics can't read. There are a bunch of people out there who are unable to hold a book in their hands.