Originally Posted by jjallenupthehill
You're not very observant about architecture, and I'm not sure you have been reading the thread carefully enough. Your point is....?
While the two buildings don't look "exactly" the same, the Apple clone is extremely derivative of prior designs, ripping-off the most prominent features of two well-known architectural masterpieces. Which wouldn't be so bad if they hadn't had the gall to patent the design. It's laughable.
If you can't see it, you're not very observant about architecture, nor are you very objective.