Originally Posted by PatNY
Not sure what you are trying to say. Are you saying someone fabricated the story? If so, who?
Obviously, either this was a newly agreed-to contract extension, OR, Samsung was allowed to alter prices at some interval in the existing contract based upon certain criteria which they obviously met. What their motives were is irrelevant, so long as they stayed within the parameters of the contract.
Bottom line, there is nothing fishy about the original story as reported. LOL indeed.
No, having read through the Marketwatch story carefully, I agree there is nothing fishy about it. The implausible spin comes entirely from the True Believers here who think that Samsung arbitrarily raised prices to "slug back for Apple's over-litigious behavior."