View Single Post
Old 11-12-2012, 08:42 PM   #3
SteveEisenberg
Wizard
SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,672
Karma: 12131152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia USA
Device: Kindle Keyboard 3G
Quote:
Originally Posted by vxf View Post
Everything digital seems to have more mistakes. The Wall Street Journal (WSJ), the Financial Times (FT) . . .
If you look at print newspapers from the 1950's and 1960's, you will notice way more mistakes than not only today's print, but also today's digital. Not just typos, which don't bother me, but out of order lines and misstatement of the continuation page.

Small-town US newspapers still often have these problems.

It may have a lot to do with circulation. Where print still has the highest circulation, it will get the most proofreading attention.
SteveEisenberg is offline   Reply With Quote