View Single Post
Old 11-09-2012, 08:43 AM   #110
Sil_liS
Wizard
Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 4,698
Karma: 33379200
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: PocketBook 903 & 360+
Quote:
Originally Posted by HansTWN View Post
Yes, I was being sarcastic.
Well, as you can see the court did consider it necessary to specify what needs to be in the apology, put limits on the size of the text, and where the apology should be placed, so trying to circumvent the decision by making the apology less visible was something that the court expected, not a childish game.

Also Apple did get something out of their behavior. They were initially supposed to run the apology with the link to the court decision for 6 months on their UK homepage. Now they run it for one month on another page.
Sil_liS is offline   Reply With Quote