|
The goal might not be permanent restriction but rather practical discouragement. Companies rarely care what happens in the distant future.
If a restriction which asserts non-ownership is imposed on users even temporarily, it can result in potential profits for as long as it stands. By the time it's found to be unenforceable and/or unfair, the people behind it might have made their money and even moved on.
__________________
The more we acquire, the greater our chance of disappointment. Less is not only more. It is also more fulfilling. "Schmuecke dich, O liebe Seele."
Last edited by Prestidigitweeze; 10-26-2012 at 03:39 AM.
|