Thread: K5 JBPatch
View Single Post
Old 10-11-2012, 11:10 AM   #800
ixtab
(offline)
ixtab ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ixtab ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ixtab ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ixtab ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ixtab ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ixtab ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ixtab ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ixtab ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ixtab ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ixtab ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ixtab ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
ixtab's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,903
Karma: 6677559
Join Date: Dec 2011
Device: K3, K4, K5, KPW, KPW2
Quote:
Originally Posted by knc1 View Post
Q: Would dealing with signed *.jar files hinder JBpatch?
One more answer to that question: no, it shouldn't. IIRC, the signature verification is done before the patching - in other words, the file is determined to be correctly signed, and only patched afterwards. This is from memory about how I implemented the class loader, so I'm only 80% sure at this time - I might still be wrong. Time will tell
ixtab is offline   Reply With Quote