Originally Posted by taustin
(Apparently, at least one person here disagrees with you on what Swedish law actually says, and he's quote chapter and verse of the law, so I find your entire position rather unbelievable.
It is not unbelievable since what is described is exactly how it was in Sweden until relatively recently. And even now good faith can give you ownership if the "crime" is not theft or robbery.
It is not obvious which principle is best here which is shown by different countries having different laws. It is nothing absurd with the principle that good faith give you ownership. It is just another choice you can make in a law system.