View Single Post
Old 09-27-2012, 09:46 PM   #202
elcreative
Wizard
elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,882
Karma: 5875940
Join Date: Dec 2007
Device: PRS505, 600, 350, 650, Nexus 7, Note III, iPad 4 etc
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jozawun View Post
You have got to be kidding.
As a logical proposition, yours is a schoolboy howler.
From memory, the fallacy is formally called something like "shifting the burden of proof".
But you can probably look it up under "Fallacies" in Wikipedia or the like.
Hardly... just thought that we might get equal time here but looks like it's the usual one-sided approach... your position is axiomatic but anything different must be proved by others... love your fallacy of not bothering with the burden of proof...
elcreative is offline