View Single Post
Old 09-11-2012, 04:30 PM   #93
Hellmark
Wizard
Hellmark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hellmark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hellmark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hellmark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hellmark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hellmark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hellmark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hellmark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hellmark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hellmark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hellmark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Hellmark's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,521
Karma: 3638167
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Maryland Heights, Missouri, USA
Device: Nokia N800, PRS-505, Nook STR Glowlight
Quote:
Originally Posted by Top100EbooksRank View Post
How much does the Galaxy S3 cost? (not subsidized)

$600 vs. $149 is a world of difference.

And i'm talking about a niche here. You're not its targeted audience.
However very very few people buy their phones unsubsidized. Hell, most carriers in North America, will charge you the same price regardless of if you bought a subsidized phone or not.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Top100EbooksRank View Post
Let's say Amazon create this device (Kindle Blaze) and sell it for $149.
Google follow suit with Nexus 5.5" (Nexus Mini), also sell for $149.

These devices don't sell as well as the 7" counterpart at $199. Say 1/10 as much.

For every 10 million Kindle Fire or Nexus 7 sold, these 5.5" tablet will sell 1 million.

Is this "worth it"? Think of these little devices as "gateway" tablets for the tweens and younger teens.

If Amazon and Google can successful sell a 7" tablet for $199, I don't see why they can't be successful selling a 5.5" tablet for $149. Even 1/10 as much as its 7" counterpart is a success in my opinion.
That is one reason why the "Phablets" have been selling so well. People always have their phones with them anymore, and if they have a larger screened phone, then they will be more likely to use that than a separate device. For instance, Apple in total has sold 48 million iPod touches since launch, compared to 86 million iPhones and 34 million iPads (which has only been available for 2 years, compared to the Touch's 5 years). People tend to want a bigger more powerful device, or a decent multipurpose device with an always available 'net connection. Once you factor in that most people don't care about subsidization, they'll spend about the same price and get one that will work as their phone as well.
Hellmark is offline   Reply With Quote