Originally Posted by Andrew H.
Here's the quote I'm looking at (from the interview):
But he doesn't go on to say that they went back to reviewing prior art, particularly with regard to the design patent. His comment about coming back the next day was in reference to his 'aha' moment regarding Apple's code not running on prior art processors.
And that in itself is flawed, as if Apple is exonerated on the grounds that their code couldn't run on prior art devices, then surely Samsung should also be exonerated since their code couldn't run on iOS?