View Single Post
Old 08-29-2012, 05:23 PM   #28
Dulin's Books
Wizard
Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,744
Karma: 12575004
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Device: Boox PB360 etc etc etc
one thing that is missing much of the typing from various experts /blogs wetc is that Samsung was not found to be infringing the rounded rectangles patent and yet the jury said the patent was valid. i dont see how that ruling is possible logically.

also the jury found Apple was not infringing Samsung's valid software and standards patents. I suppose a reasonable jury could find that way on the software but on the standards patents? Um the Apple phone works, right? So then they are infringing on those two without a license. Thats the only logical ruling.

anyway interesting news here http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?s...20828225612963 about the interview with the jury foreman you may have heard about and a the video itself

Dulin's Books is offline   Reply With Quote