View Single Post
Old 08-28-2012, 12:39 PM   #368
kennyc
The Dank Side of the Moon
kennyc ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kennyc ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kennyc ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kennyc ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kennyc ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kennyc ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kennyc ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kennyc ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kennyc ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kennyc ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kennyc ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
kennyc's Avatar
 
Posts: 31,533
Karma: 61688757
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Device: Kindle2; Galaxy SIII; Xoom; Kindle Fire
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
But was it the jury's job to determine whether or not the patents were valid, or simply to ascertain whether they'd been infringed? Surely it's the job of the patent office to determine the validity of a patent application, is it not?
Once it is brought to court it can be challenged. The patent office does what it believes is it's job but that doesn't mean it is always correct. My opinion is that design and software patents should never be issued, but that have been in the last few decades and it's difficult to stop a ship that has already sailed.

I do think it is the patent office's job to prevent issuing of frivolous patents --this rounded corner rectangle being frivolous to the max.

The jury should have overturned it as well as the flat black screen patent...

there was clearly prior art for both.

Last edited by kennyc; 08-29-2012 at 06:31 AM. Reason: issueD
kennyc is offline   Reply With Quote