Originally Posted by joehunt
From the same article:
Hmmm a jury discounting all evidence presented with the exception of what was entered by Apple's attorneys on the first day of trial
His comments are even more astonishing when you note that Samsung didn't start to present evidence until the second week.
And the juror also appears to completely miss the point that if the prior art evidence was pursued and found to invalidate the patent, then it was irrelevant whether Samsung infringed.