Thread: K5 JBPatch
View Single Post
Old 08-08-2012, 09:53 AM   #496
geekmaster
Всё гениальное просто.
geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
geekmaster's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,066
Karma: 6789001
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Щедрость не имеет пределов.
Device: *.*
Quote:
Originally Posted by knc1 View Post
Wrong person to ask.
Ask Dalede (the wiki moderator), he is the one recorded as having deleted the page.

You (and everyone else that wants it back) may have to PM him.
I PMed DaleDe requesting that he restore the JBPatch wiki page.
Quote:
JBPatch
This page has been deleted. The deletion and move log for the page are provided below for reference.
19:46, 7 August 2012 DaleDe (Talk | contribs) deleted "JBPatch" ‎ (Vandalism: content was: "This page contains information about JBPatch. JBPatch is a framework which allows to modify '''J'''ava '''B'''ytecode. At this time, only the [[Kindle Touch]..." (and the only contributor was "[[Special:Contributions/Ixta)
There is currently no text in this page. You can search for this page title in other pages, search the related logs, or edit this page.
I am curious how the original content can be interpreted as "vandalism", and why it could be considered a problem that ixtab was the only contributor.

EDIT: I restored the RAW text from the original JBPatch wiki page, but now it needs its wiki formatting put back into it so it looks like the cached page at Google.

The raw text does not contain the download links. You need to follow the google cache link at the top of the temporary replacement wiki page for download links.

Why would somebody delete valuable content like that, when it had 1800 page accesses? Deletion like that really IS vandalism.

Last edited by geekmaster; 08-08-2012 at 10:39 AM.
geekmaster is offline   Reply With Quote