Originally Posted by plib
I suspect it might have more to do with Apple's apparent contempt for the ruling of his court. If they don't post the ad then they probably are in line for a contempt of court ruling.
I'm not sure what "apparent contempt" you're talking about; the order about the "did-not-copy" language is part of the original ruling handed down a week ago. I'm interested about why the court ordered it in the first place.