Originally Posted by geekmaster
It is hard to write documentation that works for everybody. I try to be simple and generic, but that does not always work.
Yes. looking around actually everyone who mentions nc is laboured with this addendum to their docs. ho hum.
On another note more ON TOPIC:
arecord -f cd -r 192000 > ./tmp.file | tail -f ./tmp.file | ./video
but arecord -f cd -r 192000 | ./video
almost get's it
Bit of a speed problem (hehehe)
(where video is the gm code compiled as video)
I guess arecord -f cd -r 192000 > ./tmp.file
and then ./video < ./tmp.file
from another process is one solution.
That is more robust than the inline arecord -f cd -r 192000 | ./video
I'll just have a play... thanks.
anyone got a performance improvement for me? Many thanks
I'm just playing
uses about 10% of processor to do this ridiculous request
gmplay is a little more resource hungry though