I continue on this thread a discussion I started on Sigil blog :
I have a question about Flightcrew : is the verification tool in Sigil 0.5 more recent and powerful than Flightcrew 0.7.2 stand-alone ?
Because I have an .epub file in wich FC 0.7.2 stand-alone finds errors (fonts resource present in the OPF , but it's not reachable (it's unused).), but for wich Sigil 0.5 says No problem !
So, wich verification tool shoud we use ?
John’s reply :
Sigil 0.5.0 uses FC 0.7.2. Most likely Sigil is fixing some issues with the EPUB (it runs the text sections through Tidy) when opening it.
So here is my question :
But the two buttons (tidy and auto-correct) are always disabled on my configuration… So Sigil is not supposed to correct anything, right ?
So, I don’t understand why FC stand-alone says Errors with font unused (but they are ! And I don’t see any errors in my code !), and FC in Sigil says No Errors…
Is there a bug in FC-stand alone ?