Originally Posted by msundman
You are right.
The only thing that would make sense of my reply in #24 would be that I didn't read carefully enough what I replied to, and that I was too caught up with thinking about higher level functions. I don't usually make mistakes like that, but it seems I made several in this thread. (I really shouldn't partake in discussions at the end of 18h workdays; if I'm mentally too tired to code then I should realize I'm also unfit for discussions.)
And I should probably have read #32 more carefully.
It seems we are in fact in agreement:
- Putting specific acceleration for popup menus etc. in hardware is a silly idea this early in the life cycle of e-Ink;
- We could do with partial refreshes;
- We could do with a 16-times faster refresh rate;
- It is silly to call this "16-fold parallelism" in a press release.