|
Unfortunately, authors like Gould and Dawkins, because they write often of evolution in terms for the non-scientist, are consequently bashed by the pure creationists. I've found much of their seemingly anti-creationism writing to be defensive reaction to what they see as illogical alternate-reality, for which one can hardly blame them.
I think the suggestion of an academic text such as listed by @HarryT would be the best bet, as most of these are carefully presented to avoid direct questions of non-scientific theology.
|