View Single Post
Old 11-24-2007, 08:00 PM   #9
jasonkchapman
Guru
jasonkchapman knows what time it isjasonkchapman knows what time it isjasonkchapman knows what time it isjasonkchapman knows what time it isjasonkchapman knows what time it isjasonkchapman knows what time it isjasonkchapman knows what time it isjasonkchapman knows what time it isjasonkchapman knows what time it isjasonkchapman knows what time it isjasonkchapman knows what time it is
 
jasonkchapman's Avatar
 
Posts: 767
Karma: 2347
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NYC
Device: Sony Reader, nook, Droid, nookColor, nookTablet
Quote:
Originally Posted by schmidt349 View Post
You can't justify the mobipocket format's intractability by saying "it supports old devices" or "it's a de facto standard."
I don't think anyone's trying to justify the format. It's just that your complaints are a decade old. Everyone knows what a horror the format is internally.

From a technological view, the format is a travesty. From a marketing view, it's the closest thing to a de facto standard that there is in the commercial e-book market. From a technological view, Amazon probably should developed a new format, or better, worked from an existing open standard. From a marketing view, Amazon's use of the Mobipocket format at least gives the hint of a promise of interoperability in the future.

Personally, I'm willing to bet that to Amazon's target market, the ones who are going to decide if e-books really matter or remain a niche market, things like HTML, XML, OEBP, etc. are just strings of meaningless technobabble.
jasonkchapman is offline   Reply With Quote