|
|
View Full Version : monochrome video?
HMishkoff 07-10-2007, 12:21 PM I'm just learning about electronic paper, and I have a question: Are there existing e-paper products that allow the display of full-motion monochrome video?
I've read several recent announcements that claim that e-paper will be capable of displaying full-motion color video in a few years, but I haven't been able to find anything about whether full-motion monochrome video is currently available. Or perhaps nobody's working on that because video doesn't really make sense unless it's in color (?).
Any info would be greatly appreciated. Thanks for your help!
NatCh 07-10-2007, 03:01 PM Hey, HMishkoff, welcome to MobileRead! :hatsoff:
The problem with current e-ink and video is that its refresh time is on the order of .5~1 second, which would make video a bit ... jumpy.
The next iteration of e-ink, Vizplex, is supposed to be twice as fast, but that's still pretty slow.
It'll likely be a while before we get e-ink that is fast enough to handle video, either in mono or polychrome. :shrug:
P.S. I'm going to move this to the forum for future e-ink devices, so more folks will see it. :wink:
yvanleterrible 07-10-2007, 03:27 PM How about the Iliad? How's the refreshing on that? With the drawing features it follows stylus movements pretty well!
NatCh 07-10-2007, 04:12 PM It's about the same as the Reader, and still a good deal too slow for any actual video, I'm afraid. :unafraid:
HMishkoff 07-10-2007, 08:20 PM In a press release a couple of months ago (http://www.e-ink.com/press/releases/pr101.html (http://http://www.e-ink.com/press/releases/pr101.html)), E Ink said:
"The E Ink's color video prototype mentioned above is a 6-inch diagonal display with 300x400 resolution and RGBW sub-pixels and is capable of switching at up to 30 frames per second. It is expected that the video switching capability may require several years to reach the market."
Is that reasonable, or are they being optimistic? (Or does that depend on how you define "several"?)
And whatever the answer is, would be be the same for monochrome video? In other words, once the frame rate issue is resolved, is it likely to hit monochrome and color at the same time, or will monochrome video be on the market before color video?
HarryT 07-11-2007, 02:05 AM And whatever the answer is, would be be the same for monochrome video? In other words, once the frame rate issue is resolved, is it likely to hit monochrome and color at the same time, or will monochrome video be on the market before color video?
My gut feeling is that the refresh rate issue would be independent of whether the screen is mono or colour. Colour is, after all, "merely" a matter of having three sets of "pixels" to display red, green, blue.
hoodaman 07-19-2007, 02:01 PM Isn't part of the allure of E-ink tech. the fact that it has exceptional battery life in most cases since it only uses battery on page turns? Wouldn't playing video pretty much kill said battery life? I'm thinking yes and I'm also thinking if so, it would be better to use a different device that's more suitable for such a feat, preferrably something with a color screen...
HarryT 07-20-2007, 04:38 AM Isn't part of the allure of E-ink tech. the fact that it has exceptional battery life in most cases since it only uses battery on page turns? Wouldn't playing video pretty much kill said battery life? I'm thinking yes and I'm also thinking if so, it would be better to use a different device that's more suitable for such a feat, preferrably something with a color screen...
Correct. If you want video, might as well stick with LCD screens.
citius 07-26-2007, 04:01 PM Well, I'd like to differ: eInk's *other* allure is to provide an easier surface to look at. Think of...Harry Potter's moving (animated!) pictures. Transmissive LCD screens, while looking pretty dang good - does hurt your eyes after a while...
Dylrob 08-01-2007, 06:17 PM Another potential advantage would be flexibility. You could have a multipurpose device that played movies, but also benefited from the enhanced battery life while used for low-refresh applications.
kovidgoyal 08-01-2007, 06:22 PM There's no fundamental reason why you can't have persistent pixels (for long battery life) *and* a fast enough refresh rate for video, the technology just has to mature.
yvanleterrible 08-01-2007, 06:32 PM There's no fundamental reason why you can't have persistent pixels (for long battery life) *and* a fast enough refresh rate for video, the technology just has to mature.
If I understand correctly, it's not the eink display but the computing aspect that is not yet advanced enough for video?
kovidgoyal 08-01-2007, 06:46 PM not really unless you want to play highly compressed video streams
citius 08-03-2007, 12:33 AM Incorrect. The limitation in the update is the speed at which you can get the color spheres to change position - something that's innately linked to the design of the capacitor, not the controller that drives the LCD.
kovidgoyal 08-03-2007, 11:15 AM I thought it was determined by the viscosity of the fluid in the spheres. It's a tradeoff between persistence and refresh speed.
citius 08-10-2007, 10:24 AM It's a combination of the viscosity of the fluid containing the color (pigment) spheres, the charge applied across it, the drag force entailed by its motion, etc.
I would say that it's a tradeoff between not just persistence and refresh speed, but also energy storage and leakage currents in the fluid too to maintain the position; both play a role in making sure that the spheres are maintained.
|